Posted by
David C. Innes on Tuesday, February 12, 2008 8:47:24 AM
Source: Salem-News.com
If you are a Barack Obama supporter, do you find yourself expecting
not only a new kind of politics after he is elected President, but a
new form of democracy as we know it, even a new kind of humanity, not
only here but around the world!?
If so, please take this in the
non-partisan spirit in which it is intended. You need a bucket of cold
water. You need to snap out of it. When you come back to reality, you
may fall with such a crash that you end up irrecoverably bitter and
cynical for the rest of your life, perhaps even Republican.
So
heed these warnings from sober friends. David Brooks has written
sympathetically about Sen. Obama, and he is always winsome and
reasonable. Here is what he says in his column, "
Questions for Dr. Retail" (
New York Times, February 8, 2008).
Obama offers to defeat cynicism with hope. Apparently he’s going to
turn politics into a form of sharing. Have you noticed that he’s
actually carried into his rallies by a flock of cherubs while the
heavens open up with the Hallelujah Chorus? I wonder how he does that.
...
Obama’s people are so taken with their messiah that soon
they’ll be selling flowers at airports and arranging mass weddings.
There’s a “Yes We Can”
video floating around YouTube in which a bunch of celebrities like
Scarlett Johansson and the guy from the Black Eyed Peas are singing the
words to an Obama speech in escalating states of righteousness and
ecstasy. If that video doesn’t creep out normal working-class voters,
then nothing will.
Actually, I don't find the video
creepy at all. But I do find both the candidate and his hip celebrity
boosters extremely naive. O course, you can expect to find this quality
in pop singers and their young fans, but it's inexcusable in a
46-year-old United States Senator who could be our next President.
He says, "Yes we can
heal this nation," and "We are not as divided as our politics
suggests." But does he have a record of efforts to "heal" the nation
and close the "divide" in his time as Senator from Illinois? Has he
even co-sponsored a bill with John McCain? Not at all. In fact, he has
an extremely liberal voting record. That doesn't heal anything with me,
and I'm temperamentally predisposed to like people if I can. During the
campaign he has spoken very disparagingly of the sitting President and
of Republicans in general. Where's the love? Where's the healing?
Where's the change in that? I don't see a bi-partisan cross section of
America singing in the video. I see lots of young lefties whom I don't
want to see anywhere near the White House.
He goes as far as to say not only that we can "heal this nation," but that "
Yes we can
repair the world." What does that mean? Peace is going to blanket not
only this nation but the whole world? Is the world in conflict only
because the United States cannot be trusted, i.e. because American
governments have been cynical, exploitative and imperialistic? Once
they see a Man of Hope in the White House, a man of genuinely good
intentions, we will be able to disband the C.I.A. and reduce the armed
forces to search and rescue proportions?
He offers moving
appeals for "hope" in the possibility of "change" if we would only
believe that "we can." But when you look at his actual policy proposals
for how we get from here to the change, they are little different from
those of his comparably far left liberal opponent. He warns his
audience against the "chorus of cynics" who call his intoxicated
followers to a "reality check." But isn't that the sort of reasonable
counsel that you expect from a sober adult?
What I see in this
speech is high schooler idealism of the sort based solely on
inexperience and adolescent passions. He should be better than that. So
I conclude that he is either a fool or a charlatan. Which one is the
more charitable judgment? Remember, he's a successful politician. Joe
Klein, in "Inspiration vs. Substance" (TIME, February 7, 2008), also uses the word "creepy" as well as "disingenuous."
...there
was something just a wee bit creepy about the mass messianism — "We are
the ones we've been waiting for" — of the Super Tuesday speech and the
recent turn of the Obama campaign. "This time can be different because
this campaign for the presidency of the United States of America is
different. It's different not because of me. It's different because of
you." That is not just maddeningly vague but also disingenuous: the
campaign is entirely about Obama and his ability to inspire.
The electorate seems strangely open to charlatans this elections season. See "Are We Doomed to an Idiot Election?"